As you know, I’m
fascinated by how people present themselves on social media, particularly on
Twitter. Those who are legends
in their own misspelt minds, click follow only so they can spam
you with system-generated DMs, or just go straight for the money
shot in their profile.
And then there are those
who—having found tweets they think are clever, or profound (in a fortune-cookie
kind of way), or pithy—use some third-party app to keep
flinging them out to the Twitterverse.
I follow a woman (she
followed me first; at some time I must have looked at her profile and decided
she did not appear to be a pornographer, RWNJ or someone eager to sell me
thousands of Twitter followers, so I followed her back) who’s a prime example
of this. Here’s a sample of the type of thing she tweets:
Your basic corporate
platitudes. Well, earlier this week, I was scrolling through my feed and
stopped at this:
My first thought was, “Well,
that’s a complete crock of moose milk. Yeah, we want people to acknowledge our
ideas. But one splendid form of recognition is monetary, particularly when our
ideas bring in vast sums of money to the corporation. Giving us an attaboy when
we’ve favorably affected the bottom line is a sure-fire way to find your
innovators jumping ship, you cheap-ass skinflints.”
My second thought was, “Hey—I’ve
seen this before, because it sparked the same response then.”
I don’t think I
necessarily twigged that it was this woman who’d done it, but I went to her
page and started scrolling. Sure enough, in addition to Tuesday, she’d spewed this recipe for a decline
in morale and innovation on:
2 February
30 January
26 January
25 January*
23 January
19 January
16 January
12 January
9 January
5 January*
1 January
*On these occasions the
message was slightly varied:
As though “a study”—an anonymous study—is any kind of
validation. Also—she obviously doesn’t read her little platitudes before she
clicks the Tweet button. (Or, perhaps she’s just not very sure about the
construction of simple English sentences.)
Interspersed with that
little gem were others similar to it—also repeated ad nauseam.
Well, at this point, I
looked at her actual profile, and all became clear:
“Head of Global
Executive Talent” for Cisco is the antithesis of an innovative mindset. Also,
5846 tweets in nine years. I’m betting that there are actually fewer than 200
unique tweets. She’s just recycled them 300 times each.
Thank God for the mute
button.
No comments:
Post a Comment