There’s a thing that happens
when you follow one of those blow-hard self-promoting “thought leader” dopes on
Twitter: you get an auto-generated “thanks for following me” Direct Message, which
includes links to their website, their LinkedIn profile, their PayPal account
and whatever else they think they can get you to click
on to feed their web analytics.
Back in my salad days of
tweeting, I actually thought this was an attempt at reaching out, since
reciprocity is the currency of social media. Boy, was I wrong. These entities
(not sure they are all actually humanoids) are not the least bit interested in
anything you have to say. They’re only interest is in pushing
their (often system-generated) promos and platitudes into your timeline in
hopes that you’ll retweet.
These days, when I get one of
those DMs I immediately mute the moron—they see me as a “follower” and don’t
know that I can no longer see their nonsense.
Here’s an example. I follow a
lot of accounts engaged in the global support of science, research, innovation
and the like. And people engaged in research or innovation often follow me on
account of things I tweet. So when @GaryBridgeman followed me, and he didn’t
seem to be a spammer, I followed him back. Almost immediately I received a
notification from Twitter that he’d sent me a DM!
(Twitter always ends its
notifications with an exclamation point.)
The truth, however, was less
than exciting:
So I muted him and went on.
Then @EUSciComm followed me
and I again clicked the follow button. And immediately another DM.
(Yes, okay—the guy did not
stand out from the ocean of Twitter egos on the first pass, so my cursory skimming
of his profile of the second iteration didn’t flag that he was the same guy I’d
already muted and screen-capped his DM for posting here. I can be shallow too,
you know.)
This time, old Gary set his
bot to pick up my name and included it in the salutation. However, he once
again stated that he pays no attention to anything I might have to say. In both
instances he invites me to connect with him on LinkedIn to communicate. Yeah—that
would be a negative, Gary.
Evidently he does not see the
irony in talking about “creating a great community” when he can’t be bothered
to either write a personal message or respond to DMs. This does not persuade me
that a LinkedIn relationship would be worth the electrons holding it together.
No comments:
Post a Comment