My ex-manager and I had our regular catch-up
session yesterday; our first in several weeks, what with one
thing and another.
At one point the conversation veered onto the Brett Kavanaugh…drama last
Thursday, and he asked me my opinion on a couple of related issues.
One was ambient sexism, the double standard for
male/female behavior. An egregious example was Kavanaugh’s drama queen
performance, flouncing into the Senate chamber and alternating belligerence with
sniveling and sobbing. The entirety of the Republican party applauded him and
gave him full-throated himpathy, for having his life completely torn apart by
not having the greased slide into SCOTUS that they’d all promised one another.
I reported that at GHC last Friday, Anita
Hill mildly commented that no female nominee to SCOTUS (or any bench, I’m
betting) would have the license to throw a meltdown even vaguely resembling
that witnessed the previous day. And therein lies the ambient sexism.
In the business world (and politics, and pretty
much everywhere), behavior that in men is considered strong, direct,
no-nonsense and effective, in women is seen as strident, angry, unattractive
and aggressive. If women don’t speak up they’re mowed down. If they do speak
up, they’re too forceful. Performance evaluations will tell women that they’re
not assertive enough, while at the same time they’re too bossy.
If a female nominee had pulled a Kavanaugh, Senators
would be clutching their pearls and every news outlet in the nation would run
banner headlines that include the words “hissy fit”.
Essentially what this ambient sexism does is
tell women everywhere that we have no place in the greater world, so we should
remain at home; behind; out of sight; silent.
We also discussed this exercise: a professor
asked a classroom full of students what tactics they employ generally to avoid
sexual assault. Here’s the result:
Men (outside of prisons, I suppose) never think
about it; women pretty much always have to. (My manager made a good point: if
the professor had gone back and asked white and black men what precautions they
take to avoid crime, the white side would probably still be largely empty while
the black side would be full. “The resulting table would be full on the black
male and all-female sides, while the white male center would be empty. And
therein lies white male privilege.”)
That came across my Twitter feed, and I tweeted
that, while most of them have been in my arsenal, the one that resonated deeply
was the one about never renting a ground-floor flat. I have always steered
clear of them. Several people engaged on this, with one pointing out that you
have a greater risk of dying in fires if you’re on upper floors. I said I’ve
consciously considered that I’d hang from an upper window and drop—not jump—and
take my chances.
(I also don’t even have my actual home address
programmed into my sat-nav, and even entering it into Uber and Lyft creeps me
out.)
But in response to my manager’s question, I
said this kind of ambient sexism is like trying to walk in the ocean when the
water is up to your waist. The effort to take even a few steps just wears you
the hell out before you even get to your destination. And why the fuck are
women having to weigh which risk they’d rather live with, death by fire or
sexual assault?
Then he asked what my response would have been
had Kavanaugh said something along the lines of, “Yes, I drank way too much in
high school, and I did things I’m truly not proud of. I don’t recall the
incident Dr. Ford describes, but if I did it, it’s an appalling thing, and I apologize
profusely for the pain it’s caused her, both then and now in coming forward,”
and then proceeded to itemize what he’s done in the intervening three decades
to turn his life around and be a net-positive citizen. How would I respond to
that statement?
Well, I’d be inclined to accept that
acknowledgement and move on to considering other things, like his crackbrained notions
about imperial presidencies and whatnot. Because here’s the thing: high school
is when kids are supposed to do all
kinds of stupid stuff (although you’d hope that assaults aren’t part of the
repertoire). They push boundaries, and sometimes they push way too hard,
especially where alcohol or other substances are involved. They commit crimes—sometimes
felonies—and they make mistakes. Even in college that kind of shit happens,
because 18-22 year olds are still trying to transition from children to adults.
If every kid who did something lamentable during this time had to carry it
around his or her neck forever, well, we’d very few of us escape.
It’s what you do after you realize what
appalling choices you made (and what harm you've caused) that counts—how you turn your life around, make
something good of yourself because of those experiences. If Kavanaugh had taken
that approach, I think there would be a lot less derision and contempt, certainly from me.
I mean, I would definitely keep an eye on him, monitor
his alcohol consumption and probably never share an Uber anywhere with him, but
I’d move on from him being a prize prick in his youth to examine what kind of a
putz he’s become since then. And he certainly does not disappoint on that count.
However, as I went on, it’s his arrogant denial
that he ever engaged in any kind of non-choirboy behavior—despite his paean to
beer—that I find reprehensible and unforgivable. For sexual assault survivors, the
denial that the attack occurred (or that they were involved in it) basically
constitutes a second assault. It denies us our experience, demands that we
pretend it never happened, makes us less-than our attacker, assures us that we
imagined it and that there’s therefore something wrong with us even bringing it
up, even thinking about it. It also
denies us the opportunity to heal fully, because that begins with bringing the
pain and memories into the open for validation and when those loud bass voices drown
us out, it’s just so much harder.
I did not speak in the first person with my
manager, but I felt my throat tightening in anxiety and my eyes beginning to
water, so I changed the subject, although I’ve not been able to shake the
conversation.
I am grateful for Christine Blasey Ford’s
courage, her steadfastness and her grace, which has driven a crack through the wall
of belligerent denial and shouting, and released a tsunami of accounts from
women of all ages, conditions, locations of their own assaults. As Anita Hill
said to Ford, “You will feel isolated, but you are not.” Ford has freed us from our isolation. There are tens—probably
hundreds—of thousands of us, and our voices are rising together. We will not be
silent ever again. As for strident—these guys ain’t seen nothing yet.