Friday, July 24, 2015

If these yards could talk

I pretty much never go anywhere without my point-and-shoot camera. Because you just never know what you’re going to run across that no one will believe without photographic documentation.

In particular, I get a bit of a kick out of how people express themselves via their front yards. Around here, it’s not like anyone’s using their front yard to, you know, play in. They’re driving their young-uns to soccer practice and tae-kwon-do classes, not letting them chase each other around the lawn.

No, yards are just another medium for folks to project an image to the neighborhood. Like this handmade statement on a garage in Cupertino:


This sign, however, tells an entirely different story:


Evidently this is enough of an issue everywhere that the sign is available (for $16.95) on eBay. It’s advertised as a “dog lovers [sic] gift”, but I’m thinking that the people who buy it and display it aren’t at all wild about dogs, and even less happy with their owners.



Thursday, July 23, 2015

Search-suggestion Bingo

Okay, since yesterday I had a go at Google’s auto-complete algorithm, I thought it only fair to do likewise with Bing. Interesting differences.

For What, Google first gave a techie suggestion—“what is my IP”. Bing cuts directly to the bottom line.




Evidently a lot of people on both search sites are feeling a little peaky, and for Why Bing must feel it’s especially important to suggest a search for those who are really too tired to complete their thought.



It’s interesting to me that When brings a whole thing about Father’s Day on both search engines. Are people seriously so vague about when this holiday hits (even though it’s the same third Sunday in June every year) that they’re asking this question year round?



I’m also a little concerned for those who are asking about Father’s Day 2014. Still.

How brings some of the most varied suggestions—perhaps because by the time you get around to asking about methodologies, you’re all set to go. I could spend a lot of time fleshing out the stories for the How queries. Madonna? Belly fat? Ebola? Dunno about Howard’s Appliances, though.



Where gets us to a more existential place, as you might expect. I wonder a little about Bing giving pride of place to not only suggesting a tax-related query, but straight out coughing up the URL to the IRS refund page. Lotta stories there, I’m betting.



I expect the confederate flag query is fairly recent. I’m afraid to seek out wheresgeorge.com in case it turns out to be a porn site. And I have no idea who the host of The Amazing Race is, so I don’t care where he was born.

I’m very disappointed that Bing doesn’t seem to care about who let the dogs out. But I can see how knowing who invented the toilet would be high on the let-us-help-with-your-query list.



P.S. The tallest trees in the world are just up the road from me, in Redwood National and State Parks. You’re welcome.



Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Gaming Google

Sometimes I just like to poke things. I refrained this morning from poking the bumble bee that was exploring squash flowers in someone’s garden, but I thought I’d have a go at Google.

Because it’s fun to see what those crazy algorithms come up with as you’re searching for things. I mean, I love auto-complete; it's the online version of getting so stuck on various words in the dictionary that you forget what it was you went there to look up.

Today I thought I’d try those stalwarts of journalistic inquiry, the six honest serving-men of Kipling (from one of my favorite stories, “The Elephant’s Child”).

I keep six honest serving-men
  (They taught me all I knew);
Their names are What and Why and When
  And How and Where and Who.
I send them over land and sea,
  I send them east and west;
But after they have worked for me,
  I give them all a rest.

I let them rest from nine till five,
  For I am busy then,
As well as breakfast, lunch, and tea,
  For they are hungry men.
But different folk have different views.
  I know a person small-
She keeps ten million serving-men,
  Who get no rest at all!

She sends'em abroad on her own affairs,
  From the second she opens her eyes-
One million Hows, two million Wheres,
  And seven million Whys!

So here’s what Google auto-complete suggested for me, when I typed in just the word in each case:


What stories could we make up about these suggestions? For example, is the fox's poop green? Why or why not? Do you measure Madonna's age in human or dog years? What's all the concern about Father's Day, especially a month after the event? Where does hope grow, and do you have to fertilize it?

And, the ultimate question: who did let the dag-blamed dogs out?



Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Business modeling

Here’s an interesting thing about Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)— you’re not buying a permanent license to use it; you’re paying a monthly (or yearly) subscription to have access to it. The approaching-senility set may recall, in the dim-dark past, subscribing to things called “magazines” (or even “newspapers”), which arrived at their doorsteps either by delivery or mail. Back when mail actually got delivered.

SaaS is like that, only it’s an application showing up on your computing device.

There are a number of attractions to SaaS in the enterprise world: you don’t have upfront costs of buying a huge license at an even huger price, and you don’t have to have the hardware and platform infrastructure (also expensive) to run the application, since SaaS is most often hosted at an independent data center somewhere. Also—new releases just propagate themselves in the ether, and tech support for users is generally handled directly by the software vendor, not the client company.

Basically, SaaS means that companies don’t have to have IT staff to install, maintain, upgrade or support these sometimes very complex software systems. In return, the client company pays subscription fees—usually based on the number of users licensed to access the application—on a monthly or yearly basis.

To lure consumers and small businesses into their software capabilities, some SaaS companies give free access to basic versions of an app with limited capabilities. Kind of like drug dealers hanging out by a schoolyard and handing out little tastes of crack. You get accustomed to the functionality. Then—if you want more—you gotta pay.

Well, I’ve been working with someone who really likes Evernote as a collaboration tool—note taking, document sharing, that sort of thing. So I signed up for a free account using my junk email address. (That’s the one I use for Meetup, Dice, email lists and everything else that I don’t want cluttering up my blog, personal or job-seeker email accounts.) Yeah, it looked fine.

Then my friend sent me something through Evernote using my personal email account, so I had to log in using that one instead of my junk mail account.

Both of those activities were about a month ago.

Last week I got two come-ons from Evernote, offering a special deal if I buy a year’s subscription. But notice the difference in how much they want me to sign up.

The offer to the junk mail account—which I opened, played with for 30 minutes and then never accessed again—is six months free with a one-year subscription:


In the offer to the account associated with actual exchange of information with a paying subscriber I only get an extra month with a one-year subscription.


Now this is something I find very interesting—and I see it throughout the business world. They’re so busy trying to woo a new customer, they basically blow off the one who’s already using their product or service. What I find interesting is that they don’t really bother to disguise that at all.




Monday, July 20, 2015

Gratitude Monday: Feral parrots

Sometimes a girl just needs to step away from the mean streets and take a walk in the clouds. I did that recently when I got a film from the library that my BFF recommended, The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill.

As you know, I tend to treat TV as a talking lamp—I’m usually multi-tasking when there’s something on, and I just connect the dots however I feel like it. If the plot isn’t gripping, I’m not sticking.

But Wild Parrots kept me glued to the screen the entire time. My friend really appreciated the colors—and they’re indeed brilliant. What reached out to me was the gentleness: a guy finds purpose in life from being a neighbor to a flock of wild parrots in San Francisco.


Mark Bittner does not anthropomorphize the birds, or make them his pets. Yes—he gives them all names, he feeds them, and he looks after the ones that are ill. But otherwise he appreciates them and respects them. It’s just beautiful.

Even when it’s time for him to move away from them (and I have to say that the thought of the market rent of that house he was living in is enough to lay me flat), he advocates for them to the City Council. Let them live as they are—don’t exterminate them, don’t put them in the zoo for their own protection, just let them carry on.

I felt so much better about the world after watching this documentary, so I recommend it highly to you. And on Gratitude Monday, I’m very grateful that I got a couple of hours of beautiful enchantment in my life.