Showing posts with label Design. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Design. Show all posts

Friday, December 7, 2018

Flight plan


While Berlin’s Tegel airport does not positively impress, there is nothing like navigating Paris’ Charles De Galle on your way back to the District They Call Columbia to remind you what a Mickey Mouse airport Dulles is. Even with the recent expansion to IAD and the elimination of a lot of those dopy transportation modules that used to ferry you out to the gates or back from the actual aircraft, the comparison is vivid.

Here’s what I mean. CDG is the only place I’ve seen the Airbus 380 where it doesn’t absolutely dwarf everything else around it. At CDG, it looks like just another aircraft:


That’s probably because it is one freakin’ huge airport. This is just a chunk of the interior of Terminal 2E:


I did love the design, even if Air France might do a better job of managing the boarding process.

Terminal 2F was like being in an anthill after someone stirred it with a stick, both times I was passing through it. But it also had some beautiful design:


But even with all this massive space, they’ve also looked after the details:


Won’t find any of that around Dulles. Or Tegel.




Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Designed to last


In addition to Peter Norman Day, 9 October is also Ada Lovelace Day, when we honor women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). In years past, I’ve written about such brilliant minds as Grace Hopper (whose celebration I attended just two weeks ago); Nobel Laureate (for physiology/medicine) Rosalyn SussmanHedy Lamarr (who developed the radio frequency hopping system that underpins mobile telephony); research chemist Marie M. Daly; IDEO designer Barbara Beskind; and Joan Struthers Curran and Beatrice Shilling, engineers whose work contributed to our victory in the Second World War.

This year I’m branching out on the engineering theme, and giving you the noted American architect of the 20th Century, Julia Morgan. Born in San Francisco and raised in Oakland, Morgan was the first woman to be licensed as an architect in the State of California, following studies at the University of California, Berkeley, and l’École nationale supérieure des beaux-arts in Paris (where she was the first female student).

After a stint with another architectural firm, Morgan opened her own practice, embracing the Arts and Crafts style. She ran her firm in the atelier style, and was exceptionally generous in teaching those who worked with her. She designed a number of structures for the women-only Mills College and several YMCA buildings (including the one in Pasadena, where I learned to swim).

Morgan is perhaps best known for a single client, being the architect for William Randolph Hearst’s mansion at San Simeon, on the Central California Coast; we know it as Hearst’s Castle. Morgan had to incorporate a whole range of styles and architectural pieces that Hearst had picked up in his travels. Frankly, I do not find it particularly inviting as a result, but there are certainly some spectacular elements, notably the truly spectacular Neptune Pool.



But she was exceptionally prolific. Here are some other buildings she designed:

The Berkeley City Club:


The Ladies Protection and Relief Society’s The Heritage nursing home (one of only a few pre-WWII buildings to survive the Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989):


Fairmont Hotel:


Morgan got the job of redesigning the hotel, which was damaged in the 1906 earthquake. She was a pioneer in the deployment of earthquake-resistant materials, including reinforced concrete.

Chinatown YWCA:


Girton Hall (UC Berkeley):


The Sausalito Women's Club:


And those are just a few from around the Bay Area.

We don’t know much about Morgan’s personal life; architecture seems to have consumed everything for her. In the span of her career before her retirement in 1951, she designed hundreds of public and private structures, taking commissions from the ultra-wealthy to help subsidize her work for organizations serving women and minorities. Her legacy is somewhat localized, but truly impressive.


Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Domestic comfort

This exchange took place on Twitter in the days following the election.


If you need it explained to you, then…no, I cannot help you.



Wednesday, August 31, 2016

On the beach

So, I was on Twitter, minding my own business, when one of my Euro tweetmates fired something across my feed. And, warning:


Because:


Well, this sparked a couple of thoughts.

First, I suggested that my pal might want to consider the whole waxing issue before he shells out for this, erm, item. Because I’d think bikini waxing would be a showstopper for most males.

Then I pointed out that he’d better not cough while wearing it. Or possibly even walk.

But on the other, uh, hand—as long as it’s not a burkini, he’s good to go as far as the French authorities are concerned.

P.S. Yes, I know you cannot unsee this. But I did warn you.


Wednesday, July 27, 2016

What this world needs...

If you want to know how people lived in the past, you don’t turn to art, you look at fashion and architecture. I was reminded of that by this meme going around the Internet:


The wide porch or verandah was a common sight in the American South, and in colonial structures in places like India, Africa and Australia. These are all places that get right hot in the summertime, and a covered porch was a place where residents could sit in the shade, catch any cross-breezes stirring at all, and take it easy.

A secondary benefit was that they were typically constructed at the front of the house, so the residents faced out into the neighborhood, and they and passers-by could commit acts of sociability with some frequency.

In the South, things slowed down in the summer months. You wore lighter clothes. You took longer breaks. You drank cool beverages poured from glass pitchers into tall glasses. You weren’t expected to exert top effort at the office, where windows were opened, creaky fans blew air around, and there was an actual use for paperweights.


Yeah, the penny only dropped for me within the past couple of years. As a kid, I recall paperweights in “gift” shops, but only ever seeing them on people’s shelves. As far as I could tell, they were just something you stuck on mantels and the like, tschatschkes like glass animals or souvenir spoons; things that you had to dust.

But take a look at this 1943 office in the Department of the Interior, and imagine July and August, with the windows open and fans cranked up to the max. Your glass ashtray wouldn’t have been enough to keep all the stacks of paper on your desk from flying around.


And at quitting time, you’d have left that office, maybe had supper in the dining room, but then you’d have repaired with the family to the porch, to sit through the evening until it was time to go to bed. In the South, the porch or a portion of it might have been screened, because insects. But you’d still have spent a good part of your life out there. And as neighbors strolled past, you’d invite them up for a glass of iced tea or lemonade, and you’d have caught up on all the gossip.

We had a front porch in the house where I grew up.


It was in Southern California, so not quite the heat factor as in Mobile or Atlanta. But it was on a quiet street, and the kids of multiple families used to play games in one or another front yard (or—truth be told—in the street), while the parents would sit on the porch and talk about whatever parents talked about. It seems like another planet now.

(And can I just say that the current residents clearly don't use the front yard for anything, and obviously don't make much use of a lawn mower or the sprinkler system. Someone's taken out all the camellias and let the crepe myrtle go ballistic. But whatever.)

Air conditioning changed all that. It’s a tremendous boon, I am here to tell you. But you can chart the point at which AC changed attitudes toward both work and play here in the South. Office windows stayed closed (and then sealed) all year long, and full effort was expected whether it was January or July.

And houses lost those front-facing porches, swapped out for two- or three-car garages in places of prominence, with decks on the back, where individual families could engage in activities as small units. (Having the most eye-grabbing part of your house be where you park your cars tells you a lot about priorities.) You’d have to be invited to come over and have a chat or a drink.

And nowadays, of course, it wouldn’t matter where you are—front porch, back deck, living room, dining room or bathroom—each individual person would have his/her shoulders hunched over a mobile device, fully engaged with people not in front of them, whether personally known or characters in a game or scripted show. You see it when groups of people (whether families or friends) gather in restaurants: each with his/her own device, barely looking up to order or receive the food.

So it’ll take more than a meme to get people to interact in the way they did pre-60s, when sitting down with your neighbors was the best defense against nature’s idea of a summer. But it’s a nice thought.


Monday, July 11, 2016

Gratitude Monday: Reborn beauty

Last week was a slice. From the appalling events in Baton Rouge, suburban Minneapolis and Dallas; and in Dhaka and Baghdad and I don’t know where-all; to crushing crowds on Metro, five days of 90-degree temperature plus 90%-humidity and a directive to cough up out of nothing an event sometime in the next four months that will give the prospective customers not what they need, but what we have (and, BTW, the research we have done indicates that we can’t make our costs back on such an event, much less build a substantial, sustainable revenue stream)—because the CEO has a flea in his ear…

Well, basically from the macro to the micro, I’ve been looking around this weekend wondering what, exactly, the point of pretty much everything is. I feel like the widening gyre has me in a permanent state of vertigo—never exactly sure whether I’m putting my foot onto solid ground, if such a thing as solid ground exists any more.

Yeah, that’s it—it’s like that moment in an earthquake where you sense the concrete pavement beneath you has turned liquid, and you hold your breath waiting for it to stop and re-solidify.

Only these days, I’m not sure there’s an end in sight to the shock waves.

And that can make it hard to latch onto a focus for gratitude. But when you’re completely worn out, that’s when you really need that focus the most.

So, as I was vacuuming the living room yesterday (it doesn’t get as dusty as my place in the Valley They Call Silicon, but it needs a good sweep at least once a week—and that’s with all the windows and doors closed), I seized upon one of the Christmas packages my friend gave me the weekend before. (Long story, but I’m inclined to let Christmas and birthdays be somewhat fluid in my celebrations.)

I knew I was in for something good when I pulled off the wrapping and saw the Appalachian Spring box, and then I opened it and found this beautiful Fire and Light bowl.


(Fire and Light products are made entirely from recycled glass; crushed, molten and hand-pressed into beautiful dishes, vases, glasses and other things.)

My friend has a tradition of giving me a F&L wine glass from Appalachian Spring for Christmas. Whenever I move, I hold one of them out for my last drink in my old place, then I hand-carry it with me to have my first drink at my new place. Bellevue (twice), Seattle, San José, Sunnyvale, DC and NoVa. (So far.) Doesn’t matter what the contents are, just that I’m using one of the glasses.

I also get finger monsters. (One of them hid out in my handbag when I interviewed for my present job.)


So, okay—today I’m grateful that, no matter how utterly ghastly a particular day is on any level, I can come into my flat, close away the outside world, and have something beautiful in front of me to focus on—once discarded, crushed, molten and reforged as something beautiful.

I’m also grateful for a friend who opened this world of beauty to me.

Both of these will help me as I start work this week on carrying out the directive to put on an event that no one but the CEO thinks is a good idea.




Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Design creep

Well, isn’t this interesting—just one day after I happened to be discussing annoying web practices, I was doing some research on events management and came across something else that I’m seeing more frequently: online stalking.

I’m referring to the practice of having invitations to chat (or take some other action) not only pop up when you’re trying to ingest their content (in fact, before you’ve had a chance to read it), but also stalk you as you scroll down the page. Viz.:



And


I do not know what designers and companies are thinking with this, but I wish to hell they’d stop.

Yeah, okay—I do know what they’re thinking: they’re so eager for you to engage with a sales rep that they don’t care if you read their content; perhaps they don’t even want you to read it. I mean does anything shout “We want to sell you something NOW before you even know what it is” more clearly than blocking your access to the content, and continuing to block it as you try to move away from the damned box?

Not only that, it’s downright creepy to have that thing follow you about. It’s the online equivalent of Alex Forrest, and it does not encourage me to stick around your website, much less buy anything from you.




Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Age does not wither...

Whoa—it’s Ada Lovelace Day again? Already?

Well, so it is. Ada Lovelace Day being the time to consider women who’ve made stellar contributions to the advancement of society via one of the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) disciplines. In the past I’ve brought to your attention the mother of modern computers, Grace Hopper (whose Celebration is taking place in Houston this week); Nobel Laureate (in Physiology/Medicine) Rosalyn Sussman; Hedy Lamarr (if you’re reading this on a mobile device, you can thank her for developing the frequency hopping system on which mobile communications are based); and two engineers who contributed to the Allied victory in World War II: Joan Struthers Curran, whose work on little aluminum bits called “chaff” helped to foil Nazi radar and divert attention from the D-Day landings; and Beatrice Shilling, who solved the problem of British fighter planes cutting out mid-dogfight due to carburetors that weren’t designed to support the kinds of maneuvers necessary to take on the Luftwaffe.

I belong to a couple of groups sponsored by the Anita Borg Institute, which puts on the Grace Hopper Celebration, a conference devoted to women in STEM. You’ll recall that the GHC last year made headlines because Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella forgot that Twitter exists and gave a ballroom full of technically savvy women with mobile devices and Wi-Fi connections career advice centered on the notion that not asking for raises is some kind of XX-chromosome superpower.

(There was also the plenary panel of four executives of tech companies—all male—that consisted of the quartet talking amongst themselves and taking no questions from another room full of women with connectivity and social media accounts.)

GHC is about as good as it gets for women in STEM, so I hope the programs this week are more on point than last year’s. And one of the issues that I’ve seen emerging in discussions over the past few weeks is that of the invisibility of women of a certain age in tech. There were several threads in which a number of women over 35 who attended previous GHCs said that the recruiters—who attend en masse to try to attract female engineers to make their companies not look so much like frat houses—almost literally did not see them. They looked right past you if you appeared to be more than five years out of college.

And, they added, when they brought up this ridiculous situation to the ABI people, they were met with thunderous silence.

So my subject for Ada Lovelace Day 2015 is Barbara Beskind, whose dream had always been to be an inventor, but had to wait seven decades before she could fulfill it.


When Beskind was planning for college, engineering departments didn’t admit women, so she went into domestic engineering (AKA home economics) and went on to have two careers (one in the Army, then in private practice) as an occupational therapist. During those 60 years, she designed and patented various devices to help patients achieve and maintain balance.

Then a couple of years ago she watched a 60 Minutes segment with the CEO of IDEO, one of the true paradigm-shifting organizations of the Valley They Call Silicon. You may not recognize the name, but IDEO is the design consulting outfit that brought us the mouse. You know:


Among other things.

Beskind, who was ready to retire (for the second time) thought, “Hey, I’d like to work there,” so she reached out to them and they agreed that she had a lot to contribute. So for the past two years, she’s been working in just about the most innovative, bleeding-edge tech-designing field, bringing her deep understanding of the needs of aging people to the creation of a whole range of products.

Think about it—the vast preponderance of the devices and apps you find in both the enterprise and consumer markets are thought up and implemented by Millennials, people whose vision is sharp, for whom joint pain is theoretical and who have no notion of mortality. Designing for stiff fingers, failing eyes and slower movements is not in their native vocabulary. Beskind introduces those elements to them.

What I love about Beskind is that she’s living her dream of being in tech, without having come up through tech. She’s a non-engineer making extremely valuable contributions, and she is recognized by the innovation elite for those contributions. She’s a shining example for non-techies.

She’s also a role model for those of us who are not 20-somethings, who are the Brahmins of the Valley They Call Silicon. She’s kicking major design ass at age 90. We all can’t be Barbara Beskind, but if there are any true thought leaders around here, they should be taking on board the lesson that technology innovation benefits from diversity in background and age, as well as in other areas.



Monday, July 27, 2015

Gratitude Monday: Fashion awareness

I heard this story on NPR Saturday morning while on my first walk of the day. And it just made me light up: clothing that’s both functional and fashionable being designed for people with various disabilities.

I loved the process involving Air Force vet Anna Smith and Fashion Institute of Technology student Erika Morales—how Morales’s first effort fell short of Smith’s notion of style, and how it evolved from a poncho into something the reporter on air describes as being like origami.

Damn—I’d like to wear something that looks like origami.

Factoring in such things as the different measurements that come from someone seated in a wheelchair (as opposed to standing up), coverage for various degrees of amputation and textiles—this to me is the most magnificent melding of applying technology and design to solve a human problem. And in the process of solving it—of creating something beautiful that confers dignity on the wearer—everyone involved is connected in a new way.

This is indeed something to be grateful for, and I am.




Friday, September 20, 2013

Not entirely enthralled

Someone I follow on Twitter is a fan of the design site Inthralld. They often posit idealized or push-the-envelope interiors that take Architectural Digest to the max, and then three steps beyond.

The latest is this book igloo:


It’s an installation using salvaged books, and without any sort of adhesive; so at least no tomes were harmed during its production.

Here’s the thing, though: as with a lot of these Inthralld installations, this one just strikes me as wrong, all wrong. It would not be possible for me to walk into a room with this in it and not start browsing the titles. As soon as I saw one that looked interesting, I’d pull it out of the, uh, installation, and that would be all she wrote.

Know what I mean?

Here’s another: a “dome-shaped bookshelf suspended over home office space”.


It's probably the WYSIWYG in me, but why the hell would you put books in the most inaccessible part of the room, further out of reach than the African masks and antelope skulls? Are you expecting to use the skulls more often than the books? In that case, why even have the books?

And as for having to climb a ladder to get to them—that’s just a recipe for disaster. You find your book, pull it out, and of course you’re going to start reading it before you get to the floor. So, you miss a rung, and there you are, hanging from the damned ladder with a broken leg.

And you’ve probably lost your place in the book, too.

So, no, Inthralld. Just no.


Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Creative differences, Pt. 2



The second assignment of my “Crash Course on Creativity” MOOC was to take a 30-minute “silent” walk, and observe the hell out of your surroundings.

Okay, the exact wording was: “Take a silent walk for 30 minutes and make note all that you notice. You can walk anywhere - in nature, a city, or a school. Capture your observations in a Mind Map that you will share with the class. While you are observing, pay attention to the sounds, the smells, the textures under your feet, etc. Look at things that are close up and far away, and sit quietly for at least 10 minutes to notice all the things around you.”

I might have fudged a bit, because I took a P&S camera with me to capture some of what I noticed, but since I often frame things around me as photos, I thought, wotthehell.

I chose to walk down Truman Avenue, in Los Altos, because it’s quiet, it’s ordinary and it kind of reminds me of the San Fernando Valley—around Canoga Park-ish. Same mono-storied ranch houses, same dusty yards, same stuck-in-time sensibility.

No doubt—same million-dollar price tags these days.

It was interesting to me that—assuming this development dates from the 50s-60s (which it looked like), all the houses are ranchers; why no Eichlers, as there are in my Sunnyvale neighborhood? Eichler was all the rage at the mid-century.

Also interesting that there are no sidewalks on Truman Avenue or its cross streets between Fremont & Oak. There are little splotches of curbs at the street intersections, but no sidewalks, no gutters, no sign of water runoff planning.

That early in the morning (0625-0705), there wasn’t a lot of activity—the intermittent jogger(s), one pedestrian, one dog walker, one cyclist. One man was visible, sitting at his kitchen table; he didn’t look up as I walked past.

Ambient sounds: a continuo of traffic from Highway 85 maybe half a mile away, song birds and crows. Closer to 0700 there were cars on Truman—the preponderance of them going South to North; I wonder where?

Although there were indications that some residents are updating their houses (construction vehicles, supplies, skip, port-a-potty etc.), most of the houses and yards look much as they’ve done for decades. The old yards included one with a hedge of rosemary—old enough and tended enough to be a solid barrier, 56 paces around the corner lot. (That house also had a rather droopy badminton net in the side yard, one of the few signs of yard-use activity in this neighborhood. The other was a swing hanging from a tree limb. Where do kids play?)

There were also lots of old rose bushes—roses from the time when big, blowsy blooms were in fashion. I couldn’t resist patting these puffy things (or running my hands along the rosemary hedge. I’d have rolled in it if I weren’t trying to maintain some degree of circumspection.)


An unexpected splash was this…well, I’m calling it “tree art”.
  



There was some new landscaping—tea roses, “designed” areas, a water feature. But most of the yards were old, more or less tended, but apparently not thought about much.

Looking up, there was a completely cloudless sky (another relentlessly perfect day in the Silicon Valley) and a crescent moon. Later, a small plane flew overhead, and a squirrel crossed the street on the phone cables while I was doing my sitting obbo.

Breathing in—there was the rose scent, the rosemary on my hands, orange blossoms, tangerine blossoms and jasmine.

It was a bit of a struggle for me to slow down—I walk for exercise and my usual pace “in the wild” is between a 13- and 14-minute mile. I had to tell myself to slow down and absorb. I also use exercise periods to work out plot points in my novel; that day on Truman Avenue I had to keep directing my brain back to observation-only mode. No plot points, no dialogue, no character revelations.

For ten minutes I sat on the curb at the junction of Truman and Havenhurst—watched the squirrel, the cyclist, the pod of three joggers. I noticed that the street signs are brown, and that there’s a neighborhood watch in effect. I did some mindful breathing. I sat still. That may be the longest period of time I’ve sat motionless without anesthesia being involved.

Thoughts sparked by this exercise:

Who lived in these houses when they were first built? What was their life like? How and why did they move on?

 Did they not walk? Why were there no sidewalks?

I need to take a course in botany—it’s frustrating not being able to recognize all those trees.

I came across an example of cloud pruning that stopped me in my tracks. That form of training shrubbery is all about the spaces between, a concept that I’m finding increasingly important in my life.


Here’s the bloody mind map I had to create. I spent hours on this damned thing and it pissed me off no end. I understand the concept that laying out information graphically can be a help to organizing your thoughts. Whoop-di-do. And I can be just as graphic as the next guy; sometimes more so. But narrative works just fine for me. 


Whatever serenity or sense of awareness we were supposed to have attained by taking the walk was completely burnt away by having to draw what looks to me like a diseased ganglion.


 

The only creativity that was sparked in me after that was in the ways I'd like to kill the instructors.




Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Creative differences, Pt. 1


I’m taking a massive open online course (MOOC) from Stanford University’s d.school. (Look, that’s what they call themselves; I wouldn’t make that up, much less foist it onto anyone else.) It’s called “A Crash Course in Creativity.” I think there are several thousand people all over the world taking the course, which consists of video lectures and then weekly assignments.

So far we’ve had two individual assignments—post a “book cover” and 200-word autobiography, and post a mind map and narrative for an exercise in observation. I’ll post separately about the latter; you don’t need to know anything about the former.

But let me just say this: I do not get why the user experience (UX) for this course sucks so badly. Stanford is supposed to be at the cutting edge of technology—it gave us Google and recombinant DNA, for crying out loud. Why, then, does every page on the course site take about 15 seconds to load? And why do they have an archaic online editing tool? And what’s up with not being able to archive messages?

In short—why does the whole web application look like it was designed and built in 1998?

Could this be part of the “creative” challenge?



Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Book covers of the damned


They say you can’t judge a book by its cover. But they’re so, so wrong. I’m not sure how I came to find this site, but once found, it’s a guilty, addictive pleasure (well, more of a horrid fascination), because it’s all lousy book covers, all the time.

No, no—I mean really, really awful book covers. The titles stink. The graphics range from crude drawings to even cruder Photoshop mashups of images found through a Google search. The fonts are a typographer’s nightmare. The color schemes scream acid trip. Pull all those elements together & you get…well, you get precisely what you see.

A whole lot of them seem to be sci-fi/fantasy. No real surprises there—that’s the genre where if you’re going to self-publish an e-book, either you’ll whack something together on a computer or you’ll find someone on Craig’s List who’ll give you a “design” for $50. But crime (the more lurid, the better) & romance figure heavily in here, too.

The site apparently was just sitting around until one of the, ah, “authors” bitched to the collator about copyright violation (although all the images seem to be linked to their Amazon listings). Which of course sent the thing viral.

Welcome to the social network, honey.

It’s worth it to keep scrolling through the pages until you find Lumberjack in Love. (Okay, if you can’t be bothered, here it is on Amazon. It's the paperback version. Which you can own if you want to pay $4.99 plus tax/shipping. You moron.) Personally, I can’t get past the title. But the, er, graphic is just…

It doesn’t happen often, but I have no words.

Except to say that—even though a lot of these books are available to “borrow” for free on Amazon Kindle, I still wouldn’t spend the electrons on them.




Thursday, February 16, 2012

Stereotypographies

As follow-up to my previous post on typography, it has come to my attention that many of the fonts associated with the PC revolution (including the dreaded Comic Sans) were inspired by…cats!

Number 16, Courier, makes me think of Mehitabel.

Yes, I know, it was Archy who slaved at the typewriter, but still, there's something about this particular cat…

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

The sublime & the incredible

Considering that I’ve spent the last two days in a place where there is no discernible organization, much less a neat one, I’m sharing this with you.

I’d much rather contemplate these examples of thoughtful design than think about being on the phone with tech support for more than two hours today to get network access, an email account & a communications/collaboration tool account…and still don’t have a phone number.

And I’m not even going to talk about ploughing through the corporate product management process site only to be told at 1645 that there’s another, newer, process that has superseded it. And that my manager’s manager didn’t know about it.