I first ran into Jonathan Swift in high school, when I did a paper on the Anglo-Irish hostility. You know—the “hostility” that started in the 12th Century, when Henry II used the excuse of the Irish Church’s refusal to follow the Gregorian reforms (the ones that stick in my mind being monks’ tonsures and celebration of Easter) invaded Ireland.
The fusion of Mother England and Celtic Ireland has
produced nearly 800 years of literary giants: Oscar Wilde, Seán O’Casey, Oliver
Goldsmith, George Bernard Shaw, C.S. Lewis, J.M. Synge, Bram Stoker, William
Butler Yeats, Samuel Beckett and Swift among them. Swift, born in 1667,
straddled Ireland and England literally, born in Dublin, spending much of his
early adulthood in England and then return to Dublin where he was Dean of Saint
Patrick’s Cathedral from 1715 until his death in 1745. You may know him as the
author of Gulliver’s Travels, where we get a taste of his ability
to use humor to skewer the many ills he saw in the world.
The one that imprinted on me was A
Modest Proposal (full title being A Modest Proposal for
Preventing the Children of Poor People from being a Burthen to Their Parents or
Country, and for Making them Beneficial to the Publick), in which Swift
solves the problem of poverty in Ireland by permitting parents to sell their
children as food to what we’d today call members of the 1% (English 1%, to be
precise). In quintessentially Swiftian fashion, he mocks the heartlessness that
the 1% still show to the poor. It’s deadly.
Swift was politically active, first for the Whigs and then
for the Tories, and (as evidenced by Proposal and other writings) he was
vehemently opposed to Britain’s Irish policies. He managed to get up Queen
Anne’s nose, and lost his ecclesiastical appointment in England. Saint
Patrick’s, Dublin, was outside Anne’s gift, so that’s where he ended up. Toward
the end of his life he became obsessed with death, and suffered from mental
illness, quarreling with friends and growing increasingly isolated.
Today’s entry isn’t titled; it’s a concise disquisition on
the nature of hell. It strikes me as being timely, nearly 300 years later. Same
players, same outcomes. So much for progress.
All folks who pretend to religion and grace,
Allow there's a HELL, but dispute of the place:
But, if HELL may by logical rules be defined
The place of the damned -I'll tell you my mind.
Wherever the damned do chiefly abound,
Most certainly there is HELL to be found:
Damned poets, damned critics, damned blockheads, damned knaves,
Damned senators bribed, damned prostitute slaves;
Damned lawyers and judges, damned lords and damned squires;
Damned spies and informers, damned friends and damned liars;
Damned villains, corrupted in every station;
Damned time-serving priests all over the nation;
And into the bargain I'll readily give you
Damned ignorant prelates, and counsellors privy.
Then let us no longer by parsons be flammed,
For we know by these marks the place of the damned:
And HELL to be sure is at Paris or Rome.
How happy for us that it is not at home!
©2026 Bas Bleu








