Friday, July 5, 2019

Of thee I sing


I did not see the self-fluffery at the Lincoln Memorial yesterday and I don’t care about it. But NPR asked people for their personal anthems this week, so I’m going to give you a few of mine. These are songs I believe are representative of the United States, both good and bad.

You decide for yourself which is which.
  
Two songs related to the Woodstock happening, which took place 50 years ago (next month). This one, by Country Joe and the Fish, comes to my mind much more often than I’d really like. That’s because it’s still so relevant. All of it.


And here’s Eva Cassidy singing Joni Mitchell’s account of the festival.


I just love everything Sweet Honey in the Rock does. Here they are singing “We Are Climbing Jacob’s Ladder”, a recording made for Ken Burns’ game-changing series, The Civil War.



I ask you, where would we be without The Village People? Or the “YMCA”?



It was apparently a Thing at weddings in Kentucky in the 90s.

People usually think of Billie Holiday when they hear “Strange Fruit”, but for me, it’s Nina Simone.


This is a somewhat different take on “We Shall Overcome”. I can remember driving to a record shop in Vienna about 25 years ago to buy Dr. Loco’s Rockin’ JalapeƱo Band’s CD when I heard one of the cuts on the radio. This is stellar, but you have to ignore the visuals.


I’ve been thinking a lot lately about CSN&Y’s “Find the Cost of Freedom”. Not so much an anthem as a sad fact. I heard them do this at a concert back in the last century and it’s stuck with me ever since.


But finally—Woody Guthrie’s “This Land Is Your Land”. I saw Arlo and Pete at the Greek Theatre back in the 80s; this isn’t that performance, but it brings back memories.


Crank up the volume and let these songs speak to you about America.



Thursday, July 4, 2019

Tanks for the memories


The Twitters-dot-com have been on #TankWatch2019 ever since Il Douche announced (too late for cooler heads to gainsay him, as they did last year) that he’ll have “Abram [sic] tanks” and “the brand-new Sherman tanks”, “the best tanks ever” (even though Shermans haven’t been in use for more than 60 years, and they weren’t even the best tanks of WWII) at his ego-stroking rally today.

It’s not quite as good as #UnwantedIvanka, although she actually made an appearance in the current hashtag:


However, for my money, this video totally wins the Interwebz:


I myself have watched it about 20 times, and it cracks me up again and again.

The entire thread is good, too. E.g.:


Also, the suggestion that [General] Sherman should ride one of the Shermans was extra primo good.

Happy Independence Day, folks.



Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Military madness


Right, Imma try to get this out of my system before tomorrow. First #UnwantedIvanka and now the latest shenanigans out of the White House as Il Douche—unrestrained by congressional Repugs and lusting after a military parade ever since Bastille Day 2017—co-opts Independence Day as a “Celebration of Me-Me-Me”.

Taking over the Lincoln Memorial to stage his rally isn’t enough. He’s adding “Abram [sic] tanks” and “the new Sherman tanks” (which haven’t been in use since the 1950s); military flyovers; reserved seating for toadies and donors; and now silent but uniformed stage appearances by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to show how his military loves him.

I’m expecting Katyusha rocket launchers to be announced momentarily.

Anyway, one of my colleagues DM’d me on Monday to say he was hearing really loud music—the office is pretty close to both the National Mall and the White House. He wondered if it was prep for the rally. I immediately replied, “Is this it?”


(I hope this converts—YouTube has flagged it as being questionable.)

I was so fast, he wondered if I just have it on the web version of speed-dial. I told him, “It’s my jam.”

Well, it isn’t, really. But I’m wondering if some of the military bands dragooned into spending tomorrow performing for a Nazi rally aren’t practicing it. Just in case.




Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Unwanted


With nothing but the cachet of her daddy’s position, the unelected “special advisor” to the Chaos Monkey tagged along on the series of photo-ops that was the G20 meeting last week. The First Airhead, dressed like a refugee from Laura Ashley, inserted herself into meetings and photographs as though she was an actual contributor. Basically, she was at a battle of wits only partially armed.

The expressions of gobsmacked disbelief on the faces of people who are actual statesmen and diplomats told the whole story. The quintessential moment may have been the conversation among Justin Trudeau, Theresa May, Emmanuel Macron and Christine Lagarde, into which Her Vapidness tried desperately to insert herself, with eyes on the camera all the time.


This pretty much defines cringeworthy.

Then there was this actual photo, that pretty much looks like a nightmare version of Take Your Idiot Daughter to Work. The side-eyes are cherce:


Well, the call went out over Twitter under the hashtag #UnwantedIvanka to find us more instances where she might have showed up to flog her brand, and the Twitterati responded like troupers. Just as they did four years ago with Nicolas Sarkozy. Viz:
  















In many cases, given Il Douche’s utter disregard for standards of government and his core purpose to amass wealth for the kleptocracy, it was hard to know whether the pictures were real or photoshopped.

This one, for example, is an actual shot from the op at the top, with individual facial expressions called out:



You’ll note that Bonespurs is looking at the airhead’s butt. That’s the level of our leadership.

I confess that when I saw coverage of G20, this is what I thought was going on:


Also, given the performance at Osan Air Base in Korea, the actuality of this may not be far off.

There are probably many, many more #UnwantedIvanka memes by now. Take a look for yourself.



Monday, July 1, 2019

Gratitude Monday: in the kitchen


Since I no longer come home from work pissed off and exhausted from collegial shenanigans, and I now have time during the day, I’ve embarked on culinary experimentation.

It has become my custom since early in the year to have homemade pizza on Friday night. I’ll make a batch of dough that’s supposed to produce two pizzas, divide it into six balls and freeze five. Then on Thursday, I put one of the balls into the fridge to thaw overnight, and it’s all ready for my Friday night yum-fest.

Usually I use the master bathroom counter as my proofing oven—it can get to 85°F there, which is absolutely perfect for raising dough. Not so much when the AC is on. So two Fridays ago when I needed a new batch, I wrapped the daylights out of the bowl and set it out on the patio. Whoo—that worked a treat. Highest, fluffiest, most elastic pizza dough yet. Yay!

So last Thursday I thought I might try another yeasty thing. I made cinnamon rolls:


The patio was my proofing oven, and it worked fine. I kept a close eye on a visiting squirrel, but it didn’t seem at all interested.

The result was okay—the bread part seemed a little tasteless, so I’ll have to experiment. But definitely edible, and my breakfasts for the next many days are now sorted.

So I decided to tackle pavlovas with passionfruit curd. I’ve been lusting after passionfruit anything since that heavenly passionfruit soufflĆ© I had in Dublin in May. And since I found where grocery stores hide frozen passionfruit purĆ©e, I had some on hand. I still have on hand some lemon curd from the last time I made pavlovas, so I reckoned if the passionfruit stuff didn’t come out well, I could fall back on that.

Well, readers, it came out well:


And with a splodge of whipped cream (which I may have whipped just a skosh too long):


The curd isn’t as delicate as that soufflĆ© was, but it was grand all the same. Pavlovas are super summertime desserts, and I have five more and a half-pint of curd to get me through the current heatwave here in the District They Call Columbia.

This is what I’m grateful for today: exploring what I can do with a few ingredients, and boldly going where I have not ventured before. I'm thinking sourdough rolls are on the horizon.




Friday, June 28, 2019

Herb bandit


A couple of weeks ago, I noticed last year’s Italian parsley was going to seed, so I replanted it in the ground to do its thing, and potted another parsley plant in its place.

Well, Wednesday afternoon I looked out the patio door and noticed that pretty much all the flat leaves were gone, and I now had a pot full of parsley stems.


I know who the guilty party is. I need to have A Word with him.



Thursday, June 27, 2019

One point of light


Lest you think that everyone I worked with at my former employer was incompetent and churlish, here’s someone who brightened both my time on my last project, and my final day with the company.

JT is the operations manager for the entire department. When I was transferred into that group, the guy who hired me said it was a good thing because—while everyone there was quite smart—JT was the only one who had a lick of sense. That estimation was validated time and again. Whenever I needed some facts, figures or procedural knowledge, JT was my go-to.

Also, she’s the one who took the time to notify me last year that I was in danger of losing weeks of vacation time that I couldn’t roll over, thus triggering my trip to Prague, Berlin and Paris.

Last Thursday, JT popped by my office to check I was still around. Then she returned with a gift bag and a card. The bag contained a crystal (for eliminating bad vibes) and a lovely candle. The card reiterated what she told me: people often don’t get told that their work is appreciated, and she wanted me to know that she enjoyed working with me and valued what I’d contributed.

I have to tell you, that was kind, thoughtful and a balm for my soul.





Wednesday, June 26, 2019

Crazytown city limits

So. My Last Two Days on the Job.

Last Wednesday, the titular head of the program I was supporting came into my office and pulled up a chair. The last time she did that, she told me I was being let go, so I didn’t know how to take this. After the customary soliloquy on Her Life, I took the opportunity to make a pitch for her hiring me as a consultant to run the scoping of the IT system that’s absolutely critical for this program to work.

I’d printed out what my colleague LW (stands for Little Weasel, if you’re asking) had thought a sufficient Statement of Work to write an RFP for the system—five grafs of airy-fairy prose on the overall program and some (not all) of what the system needed to manage. And I’d printed out what I’d created: multiple spreadsheets, one for each module, showing what functionality was required, who the users were, how it should scale, when it needed to be in place and what modules it needed to connect with. I also had a column of questions that JC and LW need to answer about how the program operated, because they’re key to what functionality gets developed.

I pointed out to SM that my spreadsheets were what enabled four companies to submit proposals to scope the requirements; that I’d asked clarifying questions that already lowered the costs from one of them; that this was my area of expertise and I am uniquely qualified to bridge this organization to the technocrats; and that neither LW nor JC has these capabilities.

Well, SM agreed with me, and said she’d intended to propose something similar. I can’t be a “contractor” for some reason, but I can be an “on-call temp”, so she went down to HR to get that started. Interestingly, she did not inquire what I might charge for these services. Also, interestingly, her only reference to my situation was to inquire if I’d had “the conversation with HR”, about being let go. It may have been news to her that the next day was my last.

Later, LW himself popped in my door to ask if I’d have time the next day to “discuss the proposals”. I told him I could do it in the morning. He muttered something about maybe JC could come in “early” and join us. The meeting request that arrived later was for 0930, so you get a taste of what “early” means for her.

Early on Thursday (like 0630) I sent SM an email outlining what I thought was the best way to proceed. Including:

“I’d be very excited to lead the charge on scoping, building and implementing the IT. As discussed, I have the high level program knowledge that an outsider wouldn’t, plus I speak software. That positions me uniquely to drive this project efficiently. I’d love to do that. It would need to be clearly communicated internally and externally that I’m the point person, because muddying the waters on this kind of thing slows the drive and ends up costing the client more. You’d be hiring me to do the opposite.

“As I was running through my IT modules spreadsheet, it’s clear that in order to give the IT building company intelligent guidance on what the system should include, [PROGRAM] management needs to begin NOW to work out a lot more operational detail than currently exists.

“Above all else: [PROGRAM] absolutely has to set a date for launch, and be working toward that. It’s already slipped from January 2020 to Q3, and I am not sanguine about that. You do not get do-overs in this kind of thing, not when you’re playing on the field with Harvard, Stanford, UofI and Georgia Tech. I cannot flog this deceased equine hard enough. Aside from the financial implications I mentioned yesterday, we get one single chance to launch this right. I don’t know how we recover if we flub it, and this concerns me no end.”

She acknowledged my arguments, and said “I get it”. Huh. See below.

On Thursday, at 0930, I met with JC and LW in a conference room for one of the most bizarre experiences of my professional life.

I waited for LW to start the discussion—he called the meeting after all. He stacked the four proposals in front of him and faffed about until I just dove in with my comments to the effect that by asking my first round of clarifying questions, I’d at least got the bids so that we could compare pricing models, but we should now ask more questions about the approaches.

There was silence, then LW wanted to know what he should do next—eliminate two of the four and carry on discussions with the remaining two? If so, which two? Should he leave one large company and one small one? What?

I replied that we should ask questions of all of them that provide information to make an informed decision. JC chirped that she knew nothing about any of the companies, except [name]. She thought she used to see their commercials on TV. I said, “That would have been an insurance company.” And she got the order of the initials wrong.

Oh.

LW mused that, well, he’d been talking with the portfolio manager in our company IT, and she’s interested in weighing in on this (both IT and my colleagues have been extremely clear for months that neither wants anything to do with the other), so perhaps he should consult her. JC opined that this person never gets anything done, but, “You’re the boss.”

Now, it’s interesting that LW has been having these conversations without involving me, both in light of his contempt for IT and because I’m the only person on the project who’s got any software expertise, much less has been doing anything actively about getting this built. But apparently he’s the boss.

LW said he was concerned about spending money to have in-person meetings with whoever gets the scoping job. We should do as much as possible remotely. We have some money, but still… JC added that she’s had “casual” conversations with “IT people in the DC area” and they’ve assured her that you can’t build this complex a system for less than a million dollars.

Oh? Would these by any chance be people interesting in getting the contract to build it? Maybe?

Well, I ignored that and told them once again that they can’t launch this show without the IT in place, and that every day they have not launched is another day deeper into the red. JC confided, “SM won’t listen to that.” I replied that SM and I had discussed this and she understands it. I told them they need to set a realistic launch date and work toward it. JC asked me what deadline I would set; I pointed out that they need to figure out what “launch” looks like, add up everything that needs to go into it and drive the stake into the ground. She gave her customary response: “It always takes longer than you think it will to get something done here, so you might as well prepare for that.”

Yeah, no—that does not feed the bulldog. But these two will never grasp that.

Fortunately, someone else had booked the conference room at 1000, so we had to leave spot on the hour. I returned to my office and called my contacts at the four companies to let them know that I was leaving the project, that I might be back as a consultant to run the IT project, but that if not, LW would be point man moving forward. I then wrote emails to each of the four, copying him, to share his contact details.

About 15 minutes passed, and this came into my queue from him:

“Can you provide a bit of context regarding these e-mails?”

I pointed out the obvious:

“Person 1, Person 2, Person 3 and Person 4 are the points of contact for Company A, Company B, Company C and Company D, respectively. You’ve ‘met’ three of them on con calls.”

And this came back:

“Yes, I remember that. Should I be expecting a call from them or is there an action they are expecting me to follow up with?”

Completely gobsmacked, I waited about half an hour and replied:

“Not sure how to answer. These are the points of contact for any activities moving forward. [Man—it is hard to get down to sock puppets in email.] Likewise they need a POC in [PROGRAM]. We discussed asking questions; having their details will enable you to do that.

Well, a few minutes later he drifted into my doorway and mumbled that he just wasn’t sure how to proceed. What questions should he ask?

“Ask whatever you need to ask to be able to make a decision.”

“Well, and you’ll help…”

“Today’s my last day.”

More mumbling about not being sure what to do, followed by, “And then we reach out to you for your input…”

“[Weasel], today’s my last day.”

Bewilderment. “I thought SM said you’d be available…”

“Nothing’s been worked out, and I’d only come back to run this IT project.”

“I seem to be always late learning things.”

Yeah, no kidding. One of the things to which you’re late is understanding that I am not your handmaiden, and you cannot expect to pass off my expertise as your work. You think you’re the boss? Suck it up.

Well, but wait—the day’s not over yet.

I’d chatted with SM about asking the help desk to not expunge my email account—cut me off, yes, but leave the account there, because the continuity of messages would be useful for consulting. I got that sorted, turned in my laptop and went to SM’s office to say goodbye. She barely knew I was there. But she did say, “I put in the paperwork. For 20%.”

Me: “Twenty percent of what?”

SM: “Twenty percent of your current salary.”

Oh, no. No, no, no, no, no. That’s not how it works, hon. I tell you what my hourly rate is, and we go from there. Twenty percent will not feed the bulldog. She also seemed surprised that I said I’d told LW I’d be managing the IT development if I came back. So much for “getting” my email that morning. Obviously, there would be no improved communications and I’d still be pushing the rock up the hill.

But I said, “I’ll take a look at it.” And left. I dumped my badge with HR on my way out and took what I hope will be my last Metro commute for a long time. That was Thursday and I've heard nothing since then. When I said in the employee exit survey that I was worried about the viability of this program, it was exactly this sort of thing that I meant.

P.S. Not one word of farewell or best wishes from any of the three people on my "team" Not a peep.




Tuesday, June 25, 2019

Exiting the interview


Okay, I’m going to do a data dump on my final couple of days with my employer, and hope I get it entirely out of my system. Today will be the HR process; tomorrow my former colleagues.

Last Monday, I informed the head of HR that I’d be leaving around noon on my final day because I had a dentist appointment (scheduled six months ago and not able to reschedule before my insurance coverage ended), so whatever exit process they had should probably take that into account. Tuesday I received this from one of the HR staff:

“[HR head] informed us of your resignation. We are sorry to see you go, but we wish you all the best in your next opportunity!

“I’d like to schedule an exit interview with you, as your thoughts and impressions of [Company] are invaluable to positive change.”

Yes, in a department of, at most, 10 people, either no one talks to anyone else, or they just don’t care and only have a single boilerplate email to send out to all employees, regardless of the circumstances of their departure.

Prior to that interview, I had to complete an “employee exit survey”, which was every bit as pointless as I’d expected. Viz:


To Q3 I answered “unclear”. In the interview on Wednesday the HR chick asked if I’d like to explain. “Well, it was SM, then I don’t know. Then I got an email from JC announcing she was my ‘acting supervisor’, but I don’t know what that means.”

Blank stare. I expect one of the many, many workshops that these people go to annually includes how to do this.

The one-size-fits-all approach evident in the email permeated the survey. As in (required) Qs 5, 6, 10 and 12:




Note that Q 10 is required, and it has no provision for N/A. I told HR chick that they need verbatim options to all their questions. Blank stare. Q12 is just taking the piss.

It started getting juicy on Qs 13 and 14:


Although of course there wasn’t space to specify which “supervisor” was being rated, in reality it was the one who’d brought me on and not my jumped-up colleague, who would fall beneath any standard of measurement.

I got no beef with Q15, although I’m not sure what the point was. As for Q16—it was a lead-in to 17:



Aside from the company contributions to the 401(k), benefits there were bog standard, and salaries (at least in business and technical areas) are below market. (It's a not-for-profit organization, but even so...) I limited myself to commenting that, in the 21st Century, when all our applications are in the cloud, I didn’t understand why there was such resistance to remote working.

In the interview, HR chick said, “We’re working on that.”

Yeah—except that HR has been the biggest obstacle to remote work within the organization, so probably not.

The questions about formal and informal feedback from managers were utterly pointless, because—in my group—I got formal feedback during the flurry of the annual performance evaluation exercise, and nothing in between. (BTW: my manager misspelt my name all three times she used it on the form.) We were supposed to have quarterly check-ins, but that was a pipedream.

In the interview I said it was my observation that the company hired managers for subject matter expertise, and put them in charge of people, with neither skills, training nor support. So “management” functions were tacked onto their day jobs. As for the quarterly check-ins—if managers don’t have that as a metric for their performance evaluations, you’re totally dependent on the commitment of your manager to giving you feedback.

Blank stare.

By the time I got to Q23 (which, interestingly, was not required) I just limited myself to the font of all evil across the organization. They have no strategy; everything is tactical. Which is one of the many reasons my extremely measured response to Q24 is basically a prediction of failure: incompetence plus ignorance is not a recipe for viability.


As for Qs 25 and 26, without any kind of context, my response is useless: I might recommend the place to someone I don’t like.

The survey ended with the usual demographics, which I ignored.


Both the survey and the interview will have been a waste of time. I know for a fact that previous departing employees have given very candid responses to their reasons for leaving, and the information they supplied has gone into some vast Room 101 of HR faffing about.



Monday, June 24, 2019

Gratitude Monday: All of it


The weather since I left my employer has been utterly gorgeous, so I’ve had the patio door open all weekend. In late June DC, this is a marvel.

I have a couple more hoops to jump through before my health insurance is sorted, but I know what I need to do. It involves filing hard copies of forms with a government office, but I’ll take a book along with me for waiting in line.

I finally found where supermarkets file frozen passionfruit purĆ©e, so I’m going to try making passionfruit pavlovas. If that doesn’t work out, I still have some lemon curd from my last round of pavlovas last month. It’s all good.

Two interviews are planned for this week; we’ll see what happens.

My sleep has been better for the past five days; huh.

I made another batch of pizza dough on Friday. I used the patio as my proofing oven, as it was warmer than any room in my house. (I double-sealed it with plastic wrap to keep out the critters; stand down.) It rose beautifully and made the fluffiest crust I’ve had so far, and delicious pizza bianca.

A reader wrote to thank me for my post on my friend, David Royle. That reminded me how blessed I was to know him personally.

A friend whom I’m helping with his job search wrote a LinkedIn recommendation that absolutely blew me away.

Another friend called on Saturday to check in on me. We talked for more than an hour, and I taught her the difference between strategy and tactics.

I could go on, but you get the idea. I have a great deal to be grateful for, and I am.