Y’all
know what a fan I am of the Founding Fathers and how they built
the framework of this bold experiment in self-government based on their
experience with Mother England. Checks and balances in the distribution of powers;
separation of church and state; protection against unreasonable search and
seizure; the absolute right to trial by jury—careful provisions for creating a
country that would not perpetuate the elements they'd seen in an unjust ruler.
They
were products of their times, so, yeah—they built human chattel slavery into
the firmware of the state, and it never occurred to them (Abigail Adams to the
contrary notwithstanding) that women would expect to take part in political
dialog. I suspect they also never imagined heavier-than-air flight, AR-15s or breakfast burritos.
But
even as they struggled with constructing this new nation they anticipated that
things might come along that would require adjustments, the specifics of which
they could not predict; so they included provisions for adapting the government
of the people to be truly for the people. And over the years, we as a nation
ended slavery, experimented with teetotalism, then decided that wasn’t working
and revoked it. And blow me if there’s not a woman running for President these
days.
But
over the past few years I’ve come to the very disheartening conclusion that
there’s one horror that the Founding Fathers failed to provide protection
against. Because it would not have been possible, on the darkest night of their
deepest winter of discontent, for them to imagine that there would come a time
when the men (and women) entrusted by the people of this nation with the honor
and responsibility of representing us in the legislative branch would not do
their fucking jobs.
That
we would witness via every channel of mass media senators and congressmorons declining
to bring critical legislation to the floor and instead spending months and
millions on spurious “investigations” into events that don’t suit their
ideology? Refusing to even begin the
process of considering an appointment to a vacant Supreme Court seat and
presenting that refusal as a matter of principle? Pouting like teenaged girls who
didn’t get picked for the cheerleader squad, and spend their resulting free
time passing around vicious gossip about the ones who did? Performing political
theatre like marionettes on strings jerked by corporate puppetmasters?
Can
you feature Jefferson, Monroe, Hamilton, Jay or Adams sitting down in a tavern
together, lifting a glass of claret and suddenly bolting up to cry, “I say,
chaps—should we make some provision for the possibility that those elected go
completely gaga and don’t fulfill the duties of office for, oh, days at a time?
Or what if senators and representatives just—I don’t know—use their office to
line their own pockets? Should we…?” There would have been such a roar of
laughter as to shake the walls of buildings three streets over. That kind of
dereliction would have been inconceivable to them.
In
the days following 9/11, there was a joke circulating that went approximately
like this: Osama Bin Laden is killed and arrives in paradise to be met by
George Washington, who punches him in the nose. Then Patrick Henry gives him a
knee to the groin, followed by John Randolph of Roanoke, who jabs an elbow to
the ribs. Then Monroe, Madison, Jefferson and…
Bin
Laden lies writhing on the ground and whimpers, “This isn’t what I was
promised. What’s going on?”
An
angel tells him, “I told you there would be 72 Virginians waiting for you. What
were you expecting?”
Would
that those Virginians and their comrades could visit the Capitol and perform a
bit of head-shaping for those disgraceful, worthless, craven occupants who—between
all 535 of them—couldn’t come up with enough of a backbone to support the
principles embodied in the first five Amendments to the Constitution.
Or,
as this video (created more than four months ago, but still accurate) puts it:
No comments:
Post a Comment