Apparently I’m not done harping on the Santa Clara County
Library District’s (SCCLD) notion of user
interface for their online catalog. Because their product managers and UX
designers just keep on giving me harp material.
My days of browsing in library stacks are largely over,
for a number of reasons. My typical pattern is to hear about a book, or read a
review, go to a library’s website, and (if they have it) put it on hold. When
it becomes available, I borrow it. Sometimes I read reviews at the time of
publication, and if I don’t reserve the book then, I’ll forget about it by the
time it hits the SCCLD’s shelves. It’s just easier.
(Yeah, I could make a list. But then I’d have to keep
track of it somewhere. Not happening.)
I’ve already told you about their kludgy interface—with the
application just hanging like it can’t decide whether to grant your impertinent
request or not. They’ve apparently fixed that, because it now completes the
action and gives you an acknowledgement message.
Well, except that the other day this is what I got:
I couldn’t figure out what I’d done wrong, and that error
message is not particularly informative.
So when I went to the Cupertino branch to pick up some
materials on hold, I asked the guy at the circulation desk what gives. And it
turns out that library patrons are limited to a maximum of 12 holds at a time.
(You can check out boatloads of books, but only have 12 holds in the system.)
Only when I either cancel a hold or check out something that’s become available
can I put another item on hold.
Well, okay, fine.
But why could they not word their error message to tell
me that? How hard is it to say, “You’ve reached the maximum number of holds
allowed”? Why cite some mysterious “problem”, and tell me to “see a librarian”?
A librarian can’t help, unless s/he can override their system.
And, in fact, a librarian is a highly-educated person who
should be dealing with matters a lot more human than looking up my account to
try to decipher something that sloppy technocrats slapped up there because they
couldn’t be bothered to program in useful messaging.
IMHO.
No comments:
Post a Comment