A few weeks ago I went through several rounds of
interviews for a product manager position with a company in the online health
insurance space. The vertical wouldn’t have been my first choice in
opportunities, but as it happens the challenge was to devise the best ways
(over multiple web domains) to inform a vast audience of users about particular
healthcare choices.
And by “vast audience”, I mean pretty much every American
sooner or later in their life. So every possible demographic, literacy level,
education background and blah, blah, blah.
It was a very interesting challenge, and I would have
done a superb job at it. (And I do not very often make sweeping statements like
that. As in, I so seldom make sweeping statements about my capabilities as to statistically constitute never.)
I say would have because—after a week and a half of
complete silence despite pinging the hiring manager, I finally got a system-generated
no-thanks email. Not from any one of the three persons in HR and recruiting
with whom I had been in contact, but from the “recruiting team”, via a
third-party applicant tracking system (ATS). I particularly get a kick out of
the use of the first person singular pronoun, combined with the absence of any
individual name in the signature block.
What’s particularly interesting about this organization's hands-off
approach to communication is that in my first interview, I asked the person who manages the
hiring manager what they’re really looking for in the product manager they hire
for this position (aside from technical competency). “Empathy,” he said. “More
than anything, we need someone with empathy.”
And that’s all I have to say about that.
Oh, dear. I actually drafted such a boilerplate communication for a friend who does a lot of interviewing. I hope mine had fewer solecisms.
ReplyDelete